| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you use a sample of anyone's music or recording, you need their permission to use it. Without relevant permissions, you leave yourself open to a much heavier hit financially than if you just paid the royalties. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SaltyDawg Member
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 220
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had a lawyer handle all my copyright registrations. Just sign up at www.validlegal.com and they will get everything taken care of for you. Plans start at around $7 per month (mine is like $25 per month though, I got the best of the best).
There's no credit checks, and you can cancel at anytime. You have access to a lawyer for whatever you need.
It's a must have for anyone making music, or doing any kind of business for themself. Heck, it's a must have for just about anyone in this day and age.
They do all the typical lawyer stuff (defense in a trial, getting you out of jail, etc) and some other stuff you wouldn;t think of having a lawyer do normally if you had to pay- like fighting your traffic tickets, reviewing and writing all your contracts, taking care of incorrect bills (and fixing your credit), writing your will, and all kinds of other stuff.
The service is good in the USA and Canada. _________________ My gear list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MartyB Junior Member
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 64 Location: Ibiza Spain
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry dumb post, it was late and i was bored. deleted... _________________ PIV 3.2, , Kingston 2gb, Terretec dmx6fire, XP sp2 40+80+250gb maxtor drives, radion x600 250mb, Asus G1 laptop, cubase 3.02.623, Dynaudio bm15a monitors, Lots and lots of bass traps. www.quantica.eu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did you have a question that was not answered by the above texts? _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VortexWL Junior Member
Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I'm from The Netherlands and the Buma/Stemra ( http://www.bumastemra.nl/ ) manages the music rights here.
I have a question about the posting a letter to yourself method (point 3 of original post). The post here says you must register your work at your local copyright office, but the Buma/Stemra says you must post it to yourself.
How can you do this in The Netherlands ? I'm a little bit confused by both post.
Thanks in advance. _________________ Cubase 5 - Windows Vista Home Ultimate (SP2) 64 bit - Intel Core 2 Quad 2,4 GHz - 2 GB RAM - M-Audio FastTrack Ultra |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VortexWL wrote: | Hi,
I'm from The Netherlands and the Buma/Stemra ( http://www.bumastemra.nl/ ) manages the music rights here.
I have a question about the posting a letter to yourself method (point 3 of original post). The post here says you must register your work at your local copyright office, but the Buma/Stemra says you must post it to yourself.
How can you do this in The Netherlands ? I'm a little bit confused by both post.
Thanks in advance. |
Posting a copy to yourself is known as "poor man's copyright" and is largely ineffective. All it does do is to give you some timeline evidence, but the reality is that it's very very easy to forge such a thing. What you're doing is getting a date stamp on an envelope to prove timeline. It's incredibly easy, however, to forge such evidence, as you can simply steam open an envelope with a relevant postmark, insert your CD into it and then reseal it. It doesn't stand up. Added to this, if you have to use the same evidence twice, you can't as it's already been opened. There is a lot of nonsense about getting a solicitor or banker to stick it in their safe, but this has the same problems and will, in all likelihood, cost more than proper copyright registration. Registering your music with a proper copyright agency involves sending them a copy, which they then encrypt and datestamp. They can then provide a copy for any case that comes to court, with proper timeline evidence that can't be forged. Also, they can do this anytime, as the originals are never touched after the intial encryption.
I am going to have a look at that link you posted, just to clarify what they say. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Couldn't find anywhere on that site where it stated what you suggested. Could you possibly provide a link to the specific place where you found that info?
I will also stick a link to their FAQ page in the initial post, as it's very useful. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Fdisk Junior Member
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm assuming that since this thread isn't "Locked" that it's ok if I ask another question here even though no one has touched it in 2 months
anyway, about "Posting" a copy and the ways to fraudulently create them.
what about "Registered Mail."
where I live, I can go to the local post office or retail post outlet and send a letter/package by "Registered Mail" and when the letter/package is delivered the person on the receiving end has to sign for the package and all of that information including dates sent/received, who signed for it, etc. is recorded with the postal company, would this stand in court, (some of us don't have easy access to actual "copyright/patent" offices have to travel long distances),
since "Registered Mail" is used for other legal things and using it stands up: ie sending a "Registered Letter" to your landlord stating that there is maintenance required on the property, and if it's not repaired within a certain timeframe (must be reasonable) that you reserve the right to hire a contractor to do the repairs and subsequently bill the landlord for the repairs.
Cheers
RfD _________________ Custom Build
Intel Core2Duo 2.4Ghz
4GB 800Mhz DDR2 RAM
1x320GB Seagate SATA-II HDD OS & Programs
2x500GB Seagate SATA-II HDD's
2x500GB WD Caviar SATA-II HDD's
2xDVD/CD +-RW: 1- SATA, 1- E-IDE
1xCD-RW E-IDE
WinXP SP3
Creative E-MU 0404 PCI sound card
Cubase LE ▲ Came w/the 0404
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just noticed another question.
As stated earlier, this is known as "poor man's copyright" and, while there have been successfully prosecuted cases in the past, the reality is that it's simply too easy to change the contents of an envelope, and there is no way to prove that this isn't the case. As timeline evidence, it simply isn't effective. Added to which, anybody who really wanted to rip off your music would work very hard to provide better timeline evidence. It simply doesn't constitute the right kind of protection. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Fdisk Junior Member
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hack;
thanks for the response;
one reason I asked this is because of the fact the "envelopes" for "registered mail" are provided by the post office and any "tampering" with them can easily be noticed, granted if you have to open it as evidence 1 time you're pretty much hooped after that then though.
Cheers
RfD _________________ Custom Build
Intel Core2Duo 2.4Ghz
4GB 800Mhz DDR2 RAM
1x320GB Seagate SATA-II HDD OS & Programs
2x500GB Seagate SATA-II HDD's
2x500GB WD Caviar SATA-II HDD's
2xDVD/CD +-RW: 1- SATA, 1- E-IDE
1xCD-RW E-IDE
WinXP SP3
Creative E-MU 0404 PCI sound card
Cubase LE ▲ Came w/the 0404
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They can be opened easily and resealed in a way that can't be noticed. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phild05 Grand Master
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 10190 Location: Manchester
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kahlbert Grand Senior Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 3598 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hackenslash wrote: | | No, it's the same in Europe and all signatories to the Berne convention. Remember the bit about agreements being binding? That's what this was talking about. You can sell or give away licenses here, too. It's all about the agreement, which constitutes a contract. Otehrwise Michael Jackson couldn't own the creative rights to half the Lennon/McCartney catalogue. |
Just for the record: This is not totally correct. The original remark was about the copyright (Urheberrecht) itself, and although I don't know about all Europe this can not be given away in Germany. Here you cannot "sell" the fact you created something, you can only give away the right to use your creation. The various details agreed between different countries apply mainly to licensing, which is a different thing.
By the way: there are several types of Creative Commons so it might not be appropriate to overall blame it - it's just a concept for creative people wanting to freely share their works with more or less (or no) restrictions ...
Matt _________________ Dolphin Blue - Songs of Tom Waits
Intel Core2Duo E6400, 4 GB RAM, ATI Radeon, RME Hammerfall, Win XP, Studio One Pro, ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kahlbert wrote: | | Hackenslash wrote: | | No, it's the same in Europe and all signatories to the Berne convention. Remember the bit about agreements being binding? That's what this was talking about. You can sell or give away licenses here, too. It's all about the agreement, which constitutes a contract. Otehrwise Michael Jackson couldn't own the creative rights to half the Lennon/McCartney catalogue. |
Just for the record: This is not totally correct. The original remark was about the copyright (Urheberrecht) itself, and although I don't know about all Europe this can not be given away in Germany. Here you cannot "sell" the fact you created something, you can only give away the right to use your creation. The various details agreed between different countries apply mainly to licensing, which is a different thing.
By the way: there are several types of Creative Commons so it might not be appropriate to overall blame it - it's just a concept for creative people wanting to freely share their works with more or less (or no) restrictions ...
Matt |
There is no contradiction here. The original comment was about rights, and agreements pertaining thereto. The thrust of the comment was that, once an agreement is made, it is binding. Going back to the original surfacing of the points about creative commons licensing, it amounts to giving away the rights to copy your intellectual property, and it is binding. Creative commons licensing was originally created specifically for the sharing of technical works between authors of such works. It means that others' work can be reproduced within your own work, e.g. to back up a point or theory contained in your work, without having to seek special permissions to reproduce. The implications are much broader than that, but that was the thinking behind it. You still retain legal copyright, but you grant a blanket license ofr its reproduction. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK. Had a proper read now. It reads to me (although I could be wrong) as if this is something for online retailers such as I-tunes for the tracking of material licensed to them for sale by the legal copyright holders of material. This doesn't apply to you, as you are the copyright holder. The idea seems to be that they are given a unique identifier code so that your music can be tracked back to the online store where it was purchased, thereby ensuring that you get the correct amount of dosh from them when they sell your work. I would imagine that the likes of CD Baby will already have this in place. You can buy music from them by download, no? _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phild05 Grand Master
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 10190 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hackenslash wrote: |
OK. Had a proper read now. It reads to me (although I could be wrong) as if this is something for online retailers such as I-tunes for the tracking of material licensed to them for sale by the legal copyright holders of material. This doesn't apply to you, as you are the copyright holder. The idea seems to be that they are given a unique identifier code so that your music can be tracked back to the online store where it was purchased, thereby ensuring that you get the correct amount of dosh from them when they sell your work. I would imagine that the likes of CD Baby will already have this in place. You can buy music from them by download, no? |
CD Baby only provide a barcode. So no GRid codes as far as I'm aware. These numbers need to be embedded
into your tracks (unique identifiers) apparently so this needs to be done by me (presumably) in order to track who is playing my music and
where, and who owes me money should these peeps be radio stations, TV channels, etc. That's the way I understand it.
But I could be full of crap  _________________ Minimal Cheese Now in virtual cheddar flavour.
Download
iTunes
Last edited by phild05 on Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read it that the online store should be embedding these data. I'll see what I can find out from other sources. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phild05 Grand Master
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 10190 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hackenslash wrote: | | I read it that the online store should be embedding these data. I'll see what I can find out from other sources. |
Hmm, read this too: http://cdbaby.net/dd
Follow the menu on the right for more info. What's that "digitize" bit all about? _________________ Minimal Cheese Now in virtual cheddar flavour.
Download
iTunes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kahlbert Grand Senior Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 3598 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hackenslash wrote: | | There is no contradiction here. The original comment was about rights, and agreements pertaining thereto. The thrust of the comment was that, once an agreement is made, it is binding. Going back to the original surfacing of the points about creative commons licensing, it amounts to giving away the rights to copy your intellectual property, and it is binding. Creative commons licensing was originally created specifically for the sharing of technical works between authors of such works. It means that others' work can be reproduced within your own work, e.g. to back up a point or theory contained in your work, without having to seek special permissions to reproduce. The implications are much broader than that, but that was the thinking behind it. You still retain legal copyright, but you grant a blanket license ofr its reproduction. |
Might be the usual non-native-speaker issue, then. Thanks for elaborating, anyway. _________________ Dolphin Blue - Songs of Tom Waits
Intel Core2Duo E6400, 4 GB RAM, ATI Radeon, RME Hammerfall, Win XP, Studio One Pro, ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rx7heaven Member
Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 202 Location: yorkshire, uk
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know this is quite an old thread and i have read it with some concern to say the least !
I am quite new to all this, but at the moment i have a vip soundclick account.
I have 5 songs that i wrote, recorded and then uploaded onto my soundclick page for anyone to stream or download for free.
The only licensing options available when upload a song are , ,
1/ No licensing.
2/ creative commons license.
3/ paid licensing ( a fee for leasing the rights, or for exclusive rights)
What box should i be ticking for my own protection and obviously for the protection of my material ? ?
I very, very mistakenly ticked the creative commons license , , but i have changed it to paid licensing from this evening, , but after reading one of the earlier posts about creative commons licensing, i crapped myself , , , what are my options within soundclick , , how best to protect my music ??
The 5 songs are only rough demos at present, but the main tune, , melody, lyrics etc will be much the same when i prepare the final versions early next year.
Honestly , i *klonk* myself reading this thread, , , i never realised how bad a creative commons was, i rushed in with eyes closed just too eager to get my songs onto my webpage.
Surely having a song on a website is copywrite of some description , , ie/ surely soundclick know when the song was uploaded etc ? ? ? ?
I dont think for one minute that any of my songs are worthy of being stolen, , but hell , , , i sure would be *quiz* if it did happen.
How can i protect myself in the uk.
_________________
Ferrari Wiki
Last edited by rx7heaven on Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Take the 'no licensing' option, ot the 'paid licensing' option.
Read the first post in the thread again for more specific advice. Copyright is automatic on commiting your work to a hard medium, ie, a recording or paper. Registration is to ensure that you can prove your right to assert yourself as the owner of the material in question. All the info you need is at www.copyrightservice.co.uk _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rx7heaven Member
Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 202 Location: yorkshire, uk
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So , in effect, if i choose the no licencing option, and i suddenly hear a blatent rip off of one of my songs, i should be able to prove its mine by the fact that it was recorded and uploaded to a website on a specified date ? ?
Does that give me something that will stand up in a court of law somewhere ?
Thanks for your help , , kev
_________________
Sleep Disorders Forum
Last edited by rx7heaven on Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^ The date stamp from your upload can provide some timeline evidence, but on its own it wouldn't amount to much. Mostly what you need are things like your written notes, graded cpr files, bits and bobs. None of these things is a good substitute for proper registration of your copyright, but they can help in a case where neither party has an effective registration. That's what registration is all about. Remember that copyright is automatic once your piece is laid down in some hard format, such as a CD or on paper, but actually proving your copyright is a different matter, as explained earlier in the thread.
Hope that helps. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lanter Grand Senior Member
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3177 Location: Limburg, Mestreech
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone knows about or tried this?
http://www.worldwideocr.com/index.asp
Would like to hear some opinions _________________ Jan
MIDI Timing problems?
C5.5, WL7 , XP Pro SP2, NI VSTi's
P5WD2 Premium, P D940, 2Gb, PNY Quadro NVS 290 PCIex16, 2x UAD-1, 2x UAD-2 Solo, MOTU 828mk3, Layla24, RME ADI 4-DD, Midisport 8x8s
Alphatrack, Outboard MIDI & FX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting stuff, Jan. I will be doing a major update to this thread soon, specifically on the subject of creative commons licensing. There are some new versions of CC licensing that are now available, and they address many of the issues in the original CC formulation, including clauses for 'no derivative' licensing, which protects against non-,echanical infringements. Keep an eye on this thread, as I will also be laying out some alternative licensing procedures. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Discoworx Member
Joined: 02 Mar 2009 Posts: 363 Location: Krakow
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just throwing this in guys as a general guideline.
A) there is NO limit in the actual length of a musical sample being used ,i.e measure/bar/Note etc. (although concerning Drum loops, there is not a case EVER went to court for a sampled drum loop on its own being used incidentally)................generally it is classed a musical "sample" If it is a "recogniseable piece of the original work" however long or short, No Ifs or buts, this is the standard. and by being recogniseable that is up to the courts/musicologist to decide , if you wanna go that far!
also to let a few of you know, if you use a Sample, you normally would have to get permission from the owner of the copyright (either the Artist OR Record Label) AND the owner or the recording/publishing rights (label or publisher), please note it is not commonly the same people holding both "rights". the major problem concerning all of this, is the type of Record contract the artist signed at the time of the recording, or if the copyrights were assigned to another party for a fixed term under the record contract.
although covers tend to be easier to clear, just remember that the actual copyright can be , and often is, assigned to the record label for a fixed term, and is not necessarily held by the artist.
the following only as a guideline , if you use a recogniseable sample, you would normally to contact the Artist AND the publisher, if you do a cover version, you normally only need to contact the publisher, as they normally hold the rights of exploitation, and this is classed a derivative work (a cover version, is a derivative work, and has to be approved, so as not to constitute a derogatory work to the original recording...........you get me!
....................but most publishers give the go ahead, if it is up to par,and they also normally let the artist hear it too as a formality, but if the artist is in a publishing deal, he normally has signed his expoitation rights to the publisher,who in turn has no legal obligation to let the artist stop the derivative work, as thats why he has a publishing deal, to let the publisher EXPLOIT the work in any way possible to maximise revenue from the original work......get me???....
Sample == speak to the artist
Cover == speak to the publisher
and also, and i am only speaking about the UK, THERE IS NO FORMAL WAY OF ASSURING YOUR COPYRIGHT BEING PROVED, even the PRS/MCPS advise UK members to use the old postal method, as it is up to the courts to decide on a case by case basis, that you can prove beyond reasonable doubt as to your claim of original copyright, and whether you can prove ownership of the original recording, so using the above US website is actually MORE costly and certainly NOT a viable alternative to proving copyright ownership in the UK.
the best and most legally standing system in the UK, is to place the copy of a recording in your banks possession with a stamped dated receipt of the deposit,costs about 45GBP,
or as I mentioned use the tried and tested recorded postal system. 2GBP.
again to reiterate, in the UK, there is no official way of proving copyright until the day of the court case!.
Proving copyright is done in the courts!. _________________ Asus P5W Dh Deluxe - Q6600 Quadcore 2.4 ,Intel chipset, 4 gig Kingston - Cubase5 |Wavelab 6 | | Windows 7 32Bit | Ati X1150 ] Samsung 32Mb Cache - 750 x 4 | MR8 16CSX | CC121, NI Komp5, Sonnox,Sonalksis,URS, Stillwell,..blah blah......
No I Dont Check My Typos..........Im Dyeslexic
Last edited by Discoworx on Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Discoworx wrote: |
and also, and i am only speaking about the UK, THERE IS NO FORMAL WAY OF ASSURING YOUR COPYRIGHT BEING REGISTERED, even the PRS/MCPS advise UK members to use the old postal method, |
I will have to check this out, as I suspect that this is not the case. The old postal method is, and has always been, a complete myth. See the opening posts in this thread for more information in this regard. I don't know if you read the whole thread or not, but there are several reasons why the 'poor man's copyright' method is completely useless, and offers no real protection. All of these issues are dealt with earlier in the thread. If the PRS/MCPS are giving this advice, then I will be taking issue with them, as they are plainly wrong. I will talk to my friends at the PRS to clarify this issue. I am aware that some college courses are giving this out as advice to their students. In fact, one of the organisations I taught at was giving the same advice to their students until I corrected them on this point.
Until further notice, do not take this advice as read. The 'old postal method' is not, and has never been, a reliable method of protecting your copyright in any country. If you need good advice, and you have any doubts about the advice given in this thread, contact the copyright agency in your country for clarification.
What I will say is that registering your copyright with the approriate agency for your country is the only formal way of registering your copyright. The assertion by this poster in CAPSLOCK, especially in light of his contention that the poor man's copyright method is effective in any way, can be disregarded.
I will be seeking further advice on this, first from our resident intellectual property expert, and then from the relevant authorities. As far as I am aware, the copyright laws in countries signatory to the Berne convention have not changed.
If that is the case, I will ask for the above post to be deleted, and for a note to be issued to the poster to that effect. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mobius Senior Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1816 Location: Brighton, U.K.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I've only just come across this thread.
I have just registered 2 songs with www.songcopyright.org/ for $35 USD.
Seems to be a USA organisation, but I'm a UK songwriter. They say on their website that:
| Quote: | | We represent and protect writers from most countries in the world including the USA and Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand, all the European countries, South America, and a growing number of Asian and African countries. |
So do you reckon that's OK for me, or should I use www.copyrightservice.co.uk as well?
Thanks,
Darren _________________ www.mobiusmusic.net
"If you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything" Robert Zemeckis/Bob Gale/Robert E. Lee
QuadG5 2.5|MacOS10.4.11|828mk2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheHobbit Member
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 474 Location: U.K
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would probably be a good idea to email them direct, ask your questions of concern and post back to the forums - useful info  _________________ ○ PC • Synths • Audio Interface • Mixer • Ext FX • Plugins ○
"Music is the language of the spirit. It opens the secret of life bringing peace, abolishing strife. " |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackenslash Grand Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 9497 Location: The People's Republic of Mancunia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mobius wrote: | Hi,
I've only just come across this thread.
I have just registered 2 songs with www.songcopyright.org/ for $35 USD.
Seems to be a USA organisation, but I'm a UK songwriter. They say on their website that:
| Quote: | | We represent and protect writers from most countries in the world including the USA and Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand, all the European countries, South America, and a growing number of Asian and African countries. |
So do you reckon that's OK for me, or should I use www.copyrightservice.co.uk as well?
Thanks,
Darren |
Hi, Darren. Yes, that registration is perfectly fine, as it applies to all countries that are signatory to the Berne convention.
Sorry for the delay. Not been around much. _________________ Tony's Choons
Only a complete fool would push the big red BUTTON!
The views expressed in the above post are those of the poster, and in no way represent the views of hackenslash. Any damage, real or inferred, caused by these views is not the responsibility of hackenslash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|